The e-newsletter for leaders who are passionate about learning the latest concepts and implementation approaches for lean enterprise transformation.

 
       
   

 
  Current Issue: Volume 2 Issue 3 - Management ABCs
President's Column

Special Ranking & Right Sizing Issue:

Two Too Common HR Mistakes

This issue of "The LEAN Executive" is dedicated to a topic that often generates a lot of discussion and controversy when we meet with clients: employee ranking and layoffs.

You see, we have two HR requirements before we’ll work with a client:

1. No regular employee will lose their job as a result of improvement activities.

2. No “forced ranking”. This means that there is no ongoing practice for selecting a predetermined number of employees for termination.

Our team has turned down working with clients because of these requirements. Why?

First, we have a conscience. We don’t want people to lose their jobs because of our efforts. Our mission is to improve the quality of people’s work – not take it away.

Second, we’re pragmatic. We know that layoffs as a result of improvement activities and forced ranking will sabotage most lean initiatives. Creating an environment of fear destroys teamwork, and the process of engaging employees grinds to a halt.

The two featured articles in this issue lay out our reasoning and experience about this.

So, what are your thoughts?

Do you have an example of a lean initiative that failed because of these issues?

Or maybe you think we're too parochial about this. Do you know of a company whose employees are actively engaged in improving the business in spite of on-going layoffs or forced ranking?

You're invited to post your comments on our Lean Manufacturing Blog.

Please respect our policy of not identifying any companies or individuals (other than yourself), or posting any confidential or sensitive information.

-- Mark Edmondson

Trusted Resources

Favorite Bookmarks


Daily Smile

Rest assured that absolutely no subscriber or email information is shared with anyone for any reason.





We hope you enjoy your complimentary issue of "The LEAN Executive". As always, your comments and suggestions are welcome- please follow the links at the bottom to send a note to the editor, to forward this newsletter to colleagues, or to unsubscribe to future editions.

Yours in success,

The LEAN Affiliates Team


Management by Fear
The ABCs of
Rank and Fire Management

I wish Jack Welch had met my high school buddy Neil who sat in front of me in chemistry class. On the first day of the semester, our teacher Mr. Sproul explained that we would be graded “on a curve”. “The top 10% of you will receive an A, and the bottom 10% will get a D or F. This will preserve the integrity of the grading system and prevent grade inflation.”

Neil raised his hand. “But Mr. Sproul, what if you do a good job as our teacher, and more than 10% of us learn from your lectures and ace every exam? How will you choose who receives an A and who doesn’t?”

“It’s an objective process of ranking by points earned.” Mr. Sproul explained. He then briefly introduced the concept of the normal distribution, and how it applies to the physical sciences, human intelligence- and our grades.

“But Mr. Sproul, what if you do a poor job as our teacher and few of us learn very much, resulting in no one earning many points? Will 1 in 10 of us still receive an A?” Neil asked naively.

Now visibly annoyed, Mr. Sproul went on the offensive. ”That’s the beauty of ranking on a curve, Neil. No matter how poorly you learn in my class, all I have to do is award an A to the other 10% with the most points. It’s really simple.”

“Mr. Sproul,” Neil then asked wryly, “it may be simple for you, but does grading on a curve fairly represent how much the class learns from you?” I finally thumped Neil on the back of the head to save him from himself, but the damage was done. (Remember, this was high school. As adult consultants, we have developed more sophisticated ways of gaining our clients’ attention.)

Poor Neil- in spite of being one of the brightest students, he talked his way out of an A on that first day. Neil and I learned about the sting of forced ranking at an early age.

Ranking "on a curve" with quotas for each performance level, or "forced ranking" may not always work in high school, but is it a useful tool for motivating your employees? Is it consistent with Lean thinking principles? What do we recommend to our clients?

In search of answers, and with help from some of our Affiliates, let's explore the value and consequences of forced employee ranking.


Rightsizing, Not Downsizing
Layoffs are Costlier Than You Think

Employment security is one of the most critical and complex issues facing top management. This is particularly true for organizations that have implemented performance improvement programs such as Lean or Six Sigma.

Management must answer the following questions:
  • Are employees considered an investment or a cost?
  • How much improved performance and flexibility would be gained if the organization provided employment security?
  • Is it better to retrain employees or hire new ones?
  • Should the organization look at other ways to handle surplus employees besides layoffs?

Employees must ask themselves:
  • What effect will performance improvement initiatives have on my employment security?
  • Will they jeopardize or improve my standard of living?
  • Am I willing to change jobs or move to another location?
  • Will I be more valuable as a result of what I learn during the process?

Can organizations expect employees to give freely of their ideas to increase productivity if these ideas will eliminate their job or a friend's job?

How is your continuous improvement program affected by your layoff practices?

What's the true cost of laying off employees?


Affiliate Recognized
LEAN Affiliate Norman Bodek
Wins Shingo Prize

Norman's book Kaikaku: the Power and Magic of Lean was awarded the 2005 Shingo Research Prize for its insightful first-person introspective about the evolution and practice of Lean, the Toyota Production System, and the power of engaging employees.

The Shingo Prize has been dubbed by "Business Week" the "Nobel prize of Manufacturing" and recognizes research and writing regarding new knowledge and understanding of Lean manufacturing. The Shingo Prize was established in 1988 and is administered by the College of Business at Utah State University.

Further information about the Shingo Price can be found at www.shingoprize.org

Read more about LEAN Affiliate Norman Bodek

Congratulations Norman!


 

Current Issue

Volume 3 Issue 5 :
Lean Consumption

Previous Issues

Volume 3 Issue 4:
Performance Measurement

Volume 3 Issue 3:
Organizational Innovation

Volume 3 Issue 2:
Looking Lean

Volume 3 Issue 1:
Lean Management Systems

Volume 2 Issue 4:
Peter Drucker Tribute

Volume 2 Issue 3:
Ranking & Right Sizing

Volume 2 Issue 2:
Mediocre Emergency

Volume 2 Issue 1:
Goal Obsession

Volume 1 Issue 2:
Enterprise Software

Volume 1 Issue 1:
Technology